Yo Yo! You must login or signup first!

Brianna Wu Just now . ▼ I've been reading a lot of books on conversational psychology as research for next-gen dialogue wheel mechanics. Along the way, I've discovered why Twitter makes so many women in gamedev feel so terrible Humans are primed to be social creatures on a brain chemistry level. Deep relationships and interactions with others gives us a hit of dopamine. The reason solitary confinement is so cruel is because it robs us of that and screws up our brain chemistry. When we use social media, we're fundamentally looking for hit of dopamine But for some of us that are more socially developed, part of that is our mirror pathways. These help us feel and sense what those around us are sensing so we can react in more socially accepted ways. When people around us feel sad, we pick up on that. Long story short, to be a professional in games - you can't go it alone, you must be social But those that lives their lives on 4chan and Kotaku in action have brains that are far less developed in this area. You see evidence of it everywhere they revel in cynicism and negativity. They're unable to pick up socially on the pain they case us because they are fundamentally not wired in an empathic way. It says a lot that almost none of them actually work in games, while so many of us that they target do They seek the dopamine hit of having their views heard, since they have no other healthy way to share it. But, for us - because we are more social, we soak up all that negativity, which has consequences for other brain systems There's an area in the deep structure of the drain called the smart vagus. It helps us feel calm and relaxed. There are actually neurological pathways that we develop here, leading to how our brain feels overall. Their negativity triggers a fight or flight response in us -making us feel unsafe. Using Twitter and being sea lioned by them, this builds up negative neurological pathways Long story short, the more we use Twitter, the more our fight or flight response kicks in. It's a vicious circle. We're looking for the dopamine hit of having our views heard, and scanning our environments for danger - yet in makes us feel more and more unsafe. Overtime, this becomes the default, making us feel negative and aggressive For me, I will be staying off Twitter. I literally need to starve the neurochemical pathways in my brain that have this fight or flight response activated all the time. And I will consciously seek out other sources of social dopamine, namely time with friends and family

+11

Brianna Wu: "I figured out the brain science of why Gamergate ruins Twitter for women."


Uploaded by Generaal Jun 04, 2015 at 03:13PM EDT

Share Pin Download More

Origin Entry: GamerGate

File type: png

Resolution: (510px x 801px)

File size: 215 KB


NOTHING HAS F------ CHANGED 10
Gamergate (harassment campaign) Article Talk From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia For other uses, see Gamergate (disambiguation). Gamergate or GamerGate (GG)[¹] was a loosely organized misogynistic online harassment campaign and a right-wing backlash against feminism, diversity, and progressivism in video game culture. [2][³] It was conducted using the hashtag "#Gamergate" primarily in 2014 and 2015.[1][4][5][6] Beginning in August 2014, Gamergate targeted women in the video game industry, most notably feminist media critic Anita Sarkeesian and video game developers Zoë Quinn and Brianna Wu, among others.[7][8][9][10][11] The harassment campaign included doxing, r--- threats, and death threats.[12][13][14] Gamergate proponents ("Gamergaters") stated that they were a social movement, but lacked well-defined goals, a coherent message, and leaders, making Gamergate difficult to define.[15][16][17] Gamergaters claimed to promote ethics in video games journalism, claimed to be protecting the "gamer" identity, and opposed what they asserted as "political correctness" in video games.[18][19][20][21][22] Read Date Target Gamergate, online harassment campaign in 2014-15 that targeted women in the video game industry. The attacks were attributed largely to white male right-wing gamers who railed against the rise and influence of women and feminism in the industry. Gamergate served as a recruiting tool for the growing alt-right movement and helped spur the online “Pizzagate" conspiracy theory, which soon spawned the wider QAnon conspiracy movement. …………………………....…..……….…..... Attack type Victims Motive View source Inquiry XA 28 languages ✓ Perpetrators Internet trolls, particularly from 4chan, Internet Relay Chat, and 8chan View history Tools ✓ Gamergate August 2014 - 2015 Women in the video game industry See all media Online harassment campaign Zoë Quinn, Anita Sarkeesian, Brianna Wu, and others Gamergaters created conspiracy theories falsely accusing Quinn of an unethical relationship with video game journalist Nathan Grayson.[23][24][25] More broadly, they alleged unethical collusion between the press and feminists, progressives, and social critics.[17][26] [27] These claims were widely dismissed as trivial, conspiracy theories, baseless, or unrelated to actual issues of ethics in gaming and journalism.[28] [29][30] Gamergate supporters frequently denied that the harassment took place, falsely claiming it to be manufactured by the victims.[31][32] Misogyny anti-feminism anti- progressivism FBI investigation Gamergate has been described as a culture war over cultural diversification, artistic recognition, feminism in video games, social criticism in video games, and the social identity of gamers.[28][33] [34] [35] Many supporters of Gamergate opposed the increasing influence of feminism and so-called "social justice warriors" on video game culture. [2][36] Gamergate led figures both inside and outside the gaming industry to focus on methods of addressing online harassment, ways to minimize harm, and prevent similar events. [37] [38] [39] [40] Gamergate has been viewed as a contributor to the alt-right and other right- wing movements.[21][41] Video game developer Brianna Wu
Jalen Hutchinson Studied Culinary Science at Culinary Institute of America (Graduated 2014). Author has 304 answers and 740.1K answer views. 5y Not that I care that much either way, but it did expose a lot of corrupt game developers and game journalists. X Journalists would make claims of people like Anita Sarkeesian "playing video games all her life" when she openly admitted many times she is not a gamer and only starter recently (when it wasn't for an interview). Various developers trading sex or money for good reviews got exposed, journalists who accepted got exposed. People became a bit more critical about supporting a game just because the developer has a victim complex stating tat their game could have only failed because of sexism, instead of their own poor developing skills. What really sealed the deal was opposition often faking their own harassment. Anita sarkeesian and Zoe Quinn have been caught multiple times screenshotting "harassment" while showing that the harrasser's account name in the login. Or when someone called the police to help Sarkeesian against a "very real threat" she was posting about, only for police to find the harasser's messages were coming from her IP address. I just want honesty from the community, and the lies were mostly exposed by the "dreaded" gamergate. 1.3K views • View upvotes 26
View All 4,079 Images

Load 27 Comments

Moar:

1
+11

GamerGate - Brianna Wu: "I figured out the brain science of why Gamergate ruins Twitter for women."

PROTIP: Press the ← and → keys to navigate the gallery, 'g' to view the gallery, or 'r' to view a random image.


◄ Previous View Gallery Random Image Next ►

More:

Top Comments


+ Add a Comment

Comments (27)


Display Comments

Add a Comment


+ Add an Image

Image Details

1,551 views (9 from today)

Uploaded Jun 04, 2015 at 03:13PM EDT

Origin Entry

GamerGate

Tags

brianna wu, facebook

Claim Authorship Edit History
Textile Embed