What Is The 'Homer Sharingan' Meme On TikTok? The Viral 'Simpsons x Naruto' Crossover Memes Explained
-
-
Who Is 'Fruitsnacks' On TikTok? The Viral E-Girl And Underground Rap Influencer Explained -
'The Humble Apostrophe' And 'The Nefarious Anglerfish': The Grandiloquent Caption Memes Explained -
Guts Cosplayer With An Impossibly Huge Sword On His Shoulder Inspires Redraws -
What's Up With Memes About A 'Leopards Eating People's Faces' Political Party? Memes About Face-Eating Leopards Explained
![Biased and ideologically charged editing[edit] When has wikipedia started to use personal opinion and political bias in the redaction of it's articles [21]? Isn't an encyclopedia article about referenced facts? Shouldn't an Encyclopedia be as neutral and factual as possible? Why even have WikiProject Feminism 22] (a clearly delined political and ideological master censor) dictating newsworthy facts as sound or not? There's a clear inferred vested interest by that WikiProject in controlling the article about "GamerGate" just by looking at the number of edits it received (specially when compared to other articles, some much more relevant to the topic of Feminism). I can't phantom how this type of procedure will make Wikipedia reliable to the eyes of the public. What's next, a "WikiProject Creation" dictating what is and is not science?Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.108.237146 (tall) 17:35, 23 September 2014 (UTC) We already tell creationists that their views are not science, and your arguments show a lack of assumed good faith and basic understanding of the site WP Feminism is there to edit pages that document the history and ideas of notable feminists. They are not there to censor stuff. Per WP:SELFPUB, Zoe Quinn is at least a reliable source about herself. GamerGate is a conspiracy theory, and per WP GEVAL, their reinterpretation of news sources will not be given equal validity. Your claims of "clear invested interest" fail WP Assume good faith, and are are pretty solid proof that the cause you're pushing for is conspiracy theorist bollocks at any rate Further posts that continue to make the above mistakes will be treated as trolling The GamerGate folks are sadsag you want to make the world jus Ian thomson (talk) 18:05, 23 September 2014 (UTC) are aruEng ste Th Gramesats using their conspiracy the selves). Are you sure you want to be a member of their ranks? Are you sure 1ei opagating So this " are sadsacks who are using their conspiracy theory to ignore problems in their own lives (or in themselves) is what it is to be expected from a moderator of a n encyclopedia. I understand now how you do your "fact checking" and what your standards of exemption and neutrality are. Revealing, at least.-Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.108.237 146 (tall:) 18:18, 23 September 2014 (UTC) edia 1e](https://i.kym-cdn.com/photos/images/list/000/835/183/2d1.jpg "Wikipedia moderation staff has been compromised")
Top Comments
Minority
May 07, 2015 at 11:07AM EDT in reply to
Guzman
May 07, 2015 at 09:47AM EDT in reply to