The 'Moai La La La' Dance Trend Is Korean Streamer K's Gift To TikTok
Light's Potato Chip Obsession Started On This Day, When He Was Writing L And Getting Cocky
This AI-Generated Image Of Mark Zuckerberg Should Be Considered An Infohazard
TikToker's Breakdown Over Realizing They Like Boys Becomes A Viral Redraw Meme
Charli D'amelio Saying 'I Can't Do This Anymore' Is Everyone When They Drag Themselves Out Of Bed To 'Do This' Afterall

In short, some of the private thoughtsI shared in the wake of Gjoni's blog post crossed the line, and i apologize for airing them. It was an error in judgment I want to be clear that none of this affected Ars' other coverage. I don't have any kind of final say about what gets published on Ars Technica, and the two posts that Ars did on the "GamerGate" controversy were separately suggested by Culture Editor Casey Johnston, who had tracked the issue on her own and worked directly on her pieces with senior Ars editors. As noted above, the decision to review Depression Quest had already been made before any controversy had arisen. (Due to my lapse in judgment on this matter, going forwardI will refrain from writing about or providing editorial support to any further pieces published on "GamerGate,"Quinn, or Depression Quest at Ars.) This is from Ars Technica Is this article mainstream enough for inclusion?-Preceding unsigned comment added by ArmyLine (talk contribs) 01:35, 29 September 2014 (UTC) to include what? "The creator of a journalist discussion group apologized for suggesting that journalists should stand up against harassment" or "Gamergaters conspiracy theories of journalistic collusion were proven to be yet another point where they were wrong" ?- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of D 2:16, 29 September 2014 (UTC) .コAdmin Edit Conflict The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. lready being discussed above TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 21:00, 28 September 2014 (UTC) I noted something when browsing the Edit History for the page here. From what it looks, Tarc randomly rolled back Suggestion: Focus on Ongoing Controversy, not it's Origin or Historjy The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the Please use one of the many other existing sections about this subject. Please keep in mind our policy WP:UNDUE which will inform how we present content TRPoD ska The Red Pen of Doom 18:12, 27 September 2014 (UTC) appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion In the introduction to this article it devotes a lot of space to the origins of the controversy (e.g. Quinn). Why not cut the history of the controversy out of the introduction and isolate it to a sub-section concerning GG's history/origins? The introduction is way too long, and focusing on the controversy itself rather than it's origins would help cull the Wikipedia: Fair and BalancedT When have biased radicals ever colluded to shut down discussion, really now? Blocker (Mr. Fart) @FartToContinue 4h #GamerGate Reply 다 Retweet ★ Favorite

Share Pin Download More

Origin Entry: GamerGate

File type: jpg

Resolution: (1070px x 853px)

File size: 365 KB

NOTHING HAS F------ CHANGED 10

Gamergate (harassment campaign) Article Talk From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia For other uses, see Gamergate (disambiguation). Gamergate or GamerGate (GG)[¹] was a loosely organized misogynistic online harassment campaign and a right-wing backlash against feminism, diversity, and progressivism in video game culture. [2][³] It was conducted using the hashtag "#Gamergate" primarily in 2014 and 2015.[1][4][5][6] Beginning in August 2014, Gamergate targeted women in the video game industry, most notably feminist media critic Anita Sarkeesian and video game developers Zoë Quinn and Brianna Wu, among others.[7][8][9][10][11] The harassment campaign included doxing, r--- threats, and death threats.[12][13][14] Gamergate proponents ("Gamergaters") stated that they were a social movement, but lacked well-defined goals, a coherent message, and leaders, making Gamergate difficult to define.[15][16][17] Gamergaters claimed to promote ethics in video games journalism, claimed to be protecting the "gamer" identity, and opposed what they asserted as "political correctness" in video games.[18][19][20][21][22] Read Date Target Gamergate, online harassment campaign in 2014-15 that targeted women in the video game industry. The attacks were attributed largely to white male right-wing gamers who railed against the rise and influence of women and feminism in the industry. Gamergate served as a recruiting tool for the growing alt-right movement and helped spur the online “Pizzagate" conspiracy theory, which soon spawned the wider QAnon conspiracy movement. …………………………....…..……….…..... Attack type Victims Motive View source Inquiry XA 28 languages ✓ Perpetrators Internet trolls, particularly from 4chan, Internet Relay Chat, and 8chan View history Tools ✓ Gamergate August 2014 - 2015 Women in the video game industry See all media Online harassment campaign Zoë Quinn, Anita Sarkeesian, Brianna Wu, and others Gamergaters created conspiracy theories falsely accusing Quinn of an unethical relationship with video game journalist Nathan Grayson.[23][24][25] More broadly, they alleged unethical collusion between the press and feminists, progressives, and social critics.[17][26] [27] These claims were widely dismissed as trivial, conspiracy theories, baseless, or unrelated to actual issues of ethics in gaming and journalism.[28] [29][30] Gamergate supporters frequently denied that the harassment took place, falsely claiming it to be manufactured by the victims.[31][32] Misogyny anti-feminism anti- progressivism FBI investigation Gamergate has been described as a culture war over cultural diversification, artistic recognition, feminism in video games, social criticism in video games, and the social identity of gamers.[28][33] [34] [35] Many supporters of Gamergate opposed the increasing influence of feminism and so-called "social justice warriors" on video game culture. [2][36] Gamergate led figures both inside and outside the gaming industry to focus on methods of addressing online harassment, ways to minimize harm, and prevent similar events. [37] [38] [39] [40] Gamergate has been viewed as a contributor to the alt-right and other right- wing movements.[21][41] Video game developer Brianna Wu

Jalen Hutchinson Studied Culinary Science at Culinary Institute of America (Graduated 2014). Author has 304 answers and 740.1K answer views. 5y Not that I care that much either way, but it did expose a lot of corrupt game developers and game journalists. X Journalists would make claims of people like Anita Sarkeesian "playing video games all her life" when she openly admitted many times she is not a gamer and only starter recently (when it wasn't for an interview). Various developers trading sex or money for good reviews got exposed, journalists who accepted got exposed. People became a bit more critical about supporting a game just because the developer has a victim complex stating tat their game could have only failed because of sexism, instead of their own poor developing skills. What really sealed the deal was opposition often faking their own harassment. Anita sarkeesian and Zoe Quinn have been caught multiple times screenshotting "harassment" while showing that the harrasser's account name in the login. Or when someone called the police to help Sarkeesian against a "very real threat" she was posting about, only for police to find the harasser's messages were coming from her IP address. I just want honesty from the community, and the lies were mostly exposed by the "dreaded" gamergate. 1.3K views • View upvotes 26

View All 4,079 Images

Load 3 Comments

More:

+11

GamerGate - Image #839,450

PROTIP: Press the ← and → keys to navigate the gallery, 'g' to view the gallery, or 'r' to view a random image.

In short, some of the private thoughtsI shared in the wake of Gjoni's blog post crossed the line, and i apologize for airing them. It was an error in judgment I want to be clear that none of this affected Ars' other coverage. I don't have any kind of final say about what gets published on Ars Technica, and the two posts that Ars did on the "GamerGate" controversy were separately suggested by Culture Editor Casey Johnston, who had tracked the issue on her own and worked directly on her pieces with senior Ars editors. As noted above, the decision to review Depression Quest had already been made before any controversy had arisen. (Due to my lapse in judgment on this matter, going forwardI will refrain from writing about or providing editorial support to any further pieces published on "GamerGate,"Quinn, or Depression Quest at Ars.) This is from Ars Technica Is this article mainstream enough for inclusion?-Preceding unsigned comment added by ArmyLine (talk contribs) 01:35, 29 September 2014 (UTC) to include what? "The creator of a journalist discussion group apologized for suggesting that journalists should stand up against harassment" or "Gamergaters conspiracy theories of journalistic collusion were proven to be yet another point where they were wrong" ?- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of D 2:16, 29 September 2014 (UTC) .コAdmin Edit Conflict The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. lready being discussed above TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 21:00, 28 September 2014 (UTC) I noted something when browsing the Edit History for the page here. From what it looks, Tarc randomly rolled back Suggestion: Focus on Ongoing Controversy, not it's Origin or Historjy The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the Please use one of the many other existing sections about this subject. Please keep in mind our policy WP:UNDUE which will inform how we present content TRPoD ska The Red Pen of Doom 18:12, 27 September 2014 (UTC) appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion In the introduction to this article it devotes a lot of space to the origins of the controversy (e.g. Quinn). Why not cut the history of the controversy out of the introduction and isolate it to a sub-section concerning GG's history/origins? The introduction is way too long, and focusing on the controversy itself rather than it's origins would help cull the Wikipedia: Fair and BalancedT When have biased radicals ever colluded to shut down discussion, really now? Blocker (Mr. Fart) @FartToContinue 4h #GamerGate Reply 다 Retweet ★ Favorite

View Gallery Random Image

+ Add a Comment

Comments (3)

Display Comments