Advanced Search Protips

Where Are They Now? Here's What Neekolul, AKA The 'OK Boomer' Girl, Has Been Up To Since She Went Viral In 2020
The Onion Buys Alex Jones' Infowars, Plans To Make It A Channel Satirizing Conspiracy Grifters
What Is The Baby Pūkeko, And Why Are People So Obsessed With It? Memes About The Big-Footed Bird Often Mistaken For A Kiwi or Jacana Explained
What Is The 'DOGE' State Department? Memes About Elon Musk and Vivek Ramaswamy's 'Department Of Government Efficiency' Explained
Where Does 'The Horrors Persist, But So Do I' Meme Come From? The Wholesome Catchphrase Explained

+15

GamerGate - Titanium Dragon talking about the low-point and dishonesty of his doxers

PROTIP: Press the ← and → keys to navigate the gallery, 'g' to view the gallery, or 'r' to view a random image.

Titanium Dragon September 8, 2014 at 2:13 pm Reply Given that these folks are complaining about people harassing Zoe Quinn, you know, by doxxing her and her supporters, and then proceed to harass people who are trying to edit a Wikipedia article by doxing them, it kind of shows exactly what sort of person Zoe Quinn's supporters are No one named in this article has done anything wrong by trying to include reliably source information, appearing in places including Business Insider, Forbes, The Guardian, and numerous other sources. It is notable at this point - far more so than Zoe Quinn is as a person. I don't care about myself (as I noted, who I am is not a secret), but posting pictures of a minor - an apparently transgendered minor - is -completely- out of line, and the person in question, as a supposed advocate for social justice should KNOW this not only are they a minor, but they might also be trans, and thus, are part of a vulnerable population. This is exactly the sort of thing that Zoe Quinn is whining about happening to her, except this is worse, because the editor in question Tutelary- hasn't spent years harassing people on the internet. defend people from harassment, that's I mean, seriously, if you're t fine, and sometimes people DO make attack articles on Wikipedia. When something appears in literally hundreds of reliable sources (and over ten -million- places on the internet at this point, according to Google) I think the idea that it isn't noteworthy is pretty questionable. Wikipedia reports on what is notable, and it is hard to talk about the whole GamerGate nonsense without explaining what caused it (namely, an angry post by Zoe Quinn's ex posting evidence of her sleeping around with game developers and journalists). The original person who did it didn't realize what he was setting off; he was making an angry post about his ex, but because of the WHO, it blew up. It is really impossible to mention the claims of misogyny, corruption, censorship, ect. without explaining what started the whole thing. And yet, some folks are upset because they don't want it included because it reflects badly on Zoe Quinn rying to It totally does. But Wikipedia is NOT a platform for making people look good or bad - it is a platform for disseminating information about noteworthy events. We have details on the Monica Lewinsky affair and the affairs of various royal family folk, we have articles which touch on numerous scandals, we have articles about all sorts of random things. The key is notability When something shows up in hundreds of reliable source and millions of places on the internet, it is almost always notable to at least some extent. My interest is in documenting it. I sometimes try and go in to present events - shootings and the like - and make sure that the article maintains a neutral tone. People get emotionally charged about stuff

View Gallery Random Image

Top Comment

ratalada

ratalada

Sep 29, 2014 at 11:47AM EDT in reply to Misk Wisk

pro-quinn doxed people pro neutrality because they did changes they didn't agree with. (titanium dragon and tutelary)

+3

+ Add a Comment

Comments (5)

Display Comments

Legal Information: Know Your Meme ® is a trademark of Literally Media Ltd. By using this site, you are agreeing by the site's terms of use and privacy policy and DMCA policy.
© 2007-2024 Literally Media Ltd.