Reddit - Images

Sorted By:

Zimbabwe critic banned for having a different opinion

you've been banned from /r/history subreddit message via /r/history/ sent 3 days ago you have been banned from posting to /r/history note from the moderators: Glamourising racist regimes is not tolerated on /r/history you can contact the moderators regarding your ban by replying to this message. warning: using other accounts to circumvent a subreddit ban is considered a violation of reddit's site rules and can result in being banned from reddit entirely. permalink report block subreddit mark unread reply re: Ban Appeal from Georgy_K_Zhukov [M] via /r/history/ sent 6 hours ago Rhodesia was a racist apartheid state. Period, end of story. Holding up the myriad issues found in modern Zimbabwe is a red herring that does not actually have anything to do that discussion. Defending the behavior and existence of Rhodesia is either racist or ignorant; only you know you which is true, and frankly I don't care to figure out which it is, but if the latter, you are welcome to research the issue, write an essay admitting the error of your ways and how you now understand just how terrible Rhodesia was, and maybe we'll consider unbanning you (Protip: This is a good starting place. If it is the former however, well, feel free to yell "censorship" all you want, but we don't really care, nor consider it applicable. /r/history is a place to discuss legitimate history, not post offensively racist propaganda. There are plenty of subreddit where you are welcome to praise Ian Smith till the cows come home, but this isn't one of them permalink report block user mark unread reply re: Ban Appeal from Quouar [M] via /r/history/ sent 6 hours ago they were fighting to protect their homes from exactly what is happening in Zimbabwe right now. This sort of rhetoric is exactly why you were banned. Rhodesia was a ferociously racist regime, not a heroic one. You will not be unbanned. permalink report block user mark unread reply
you've been banned from /r/history subreddit message via /r/history/ sent 3 days ago you have been banned from posting to /r/history note from the moderators: Glamourising racist regimes is not tolerated on /r/history you can contact the moderators regarding your ban by replying to this message. warning: using other accounts to circumvent a subreddit ban is considered a violation of reddit's site rules and can result in being banned from reddit entirely. permalink report block subreddit mark unread reply re: Ban Appeal from Georgy_K_Zhukov [M] via /r/history/ sent 6 hours ago Rhodesia was a racist apartheid state. Period, end of story. Holding up the myriad issues found in modern Zimbabwe is a red herring that does not actually have anything to do that discussion. Defending the behavior and existence of Rhodesia is either racist or ignorant; only you know you which is true, and frankly I don't care to figure out which it is, but if the latter, you are welcome to research the issue, write an essay admitting the error of your ways and how you now understand just how terrible Rhodesia was, and maybe we'll consider unbanning you (Protip: This is a good starting place. If it is the former however, well, feel free to yell "censorship" all you want, but we don't really care, nor consider it applicable. /r/history is a place to discuss legitimate history, not post offensively racist propaganda. There are plenty of subreddit where you are welcome to praise Ian Smith till the cows come home, but this isn't one of them permalink report block user mark unread reply re: Ban Appeal from Quouar [M] via /r/history/ sent 6 hours ago they were fighting to protect their homes from exactly what is happening in Zimbabwe right now. This sort of rhetoric is exactly why you were banned. Rhodesia was a ferociously racist regime, not a heroic one. You will not be unbanned. permalink report block user mark unread reply

Reddit
censorship history reddit mod abuse

Discussion about how free speech should be handled

↑ [Discussion] Should the limits of speech on the internet be decided by a handful of CEOs? (self.Kotakul Action) submitted 6 minutes ago by Namrok More and more lately, I see this same argument. "Reddit/Twitter/Facebook is a privately owned company. You are using it for free. They can permit or disallow whatever they want." It's hard to argue against such a myopic view. It's technically true But let me ask you this. In the 21st century, do we want the limits of speech decided by a handful of CEOs? Do we want to surrender truly free speech to platform holders only? We haven't just seen FatPeopleHate and other distasteful subreddits vanish. Weve seen a lot of legitimate research, critique and news vanish down the memory hole too. Individual subreddits have their unequally applied sort of true from a certain point of view reasons for vanishing articles their community clearly wants to discuss. But when they appear on other subreddits, they still vanish off rlall once the admins in San Francisco wake up in the morning. And using their media connections, I've seen almost every tech page I read cover this negatively I have never in my life seen the news defend a CEO which takes over a company, horribly misunderstands it's customers and culture, and runs it into the ground. Ever. It's entirely unprecedented. But they are defending Ellen Pao on blatantly ideological grounds, and it disgust me I can't believe my generation, the one that grew up with unfettered free speech on the wild west of the internet, grew up and went "We've outgrown offensive speech, now nobody else should get to enjoy it either." 4 comments share all 4 comments sorted by: best ▼ H sscat [score hidden] 3 minutes ago F--- no! The news media is the old guard, they want the internet destroyed so you come crawling back to them to watch/read their stuff. They want the internet dead and gone forever permalink H TheMindUnfettered Grand Poobah of GamerGate [score hidden] 2 minutes ago But let me ask you this. In the 21st century, do we want the limits of speech decided by a handful of CEOs? Do we want to surrender truly free speech to platform holders only? What alternative do you propose? The trend is for social interaction to concentrate on a few platforms, which means that the p who control those platforms are going to control social interaction. This is nothing new, really. Every time a platform becomes toxic, people just move onto a new one. Digg -> Reddit. eople reifenstag [score hidden] a minute ago wow, if only someone could think up an idea of a free market where people could choose to support or protest the companies they want to by using or boycotting them..
↑ [Discussion] Should the limits of speech on the internet be decided by a handful of CEOs? (self.Kotakul Action) submitted 6 minutes ago by Namrok More and more lately, I see this same argument. "Reddit/Twitter/Facebook is a privately owned company. You are using it for free. They can permit or disallow whatever they want." It's hard to argue against such a myopic view. It's technically true But let me ask you this. In the 21st century, do we want the limits of speech decided by a handful of CEOs? Do we want to surrender truly free speech to platform holders only? We haven't just seen FatPeopleHate and other distasteful subreddits vanish. Weve seen a lot of legitimate research, critique and news vanish down the memory hole too. Individual subreddits have their unequally applied sort of true from a certain point of view reasons for vanishing articles their community clearly wants to discuss. But when they appear on other subreddits, they still vanish off rlall once the admins in San Francisco wake up in the morning. And using their media connections, I've seen almost every tech page I read cover this negatively I have never in my life seen the news defend a CEO which takes over a company, horribly misunderstands it's customers and culture, and runs it into the ground. Ever. It's entirely unprecedented. But they are defending Ellen Pao on blatantly ideological grounds, and it disgust me I can't believe my generation, the one that grew up with unfettered free speech on the wild west of the internet, grew up and went "We've outgrown offensive speech, now nobody else should get to enjoy it either." 4 comments share all 4 comments sorted by: best ▼ H sscat [score hidden] 3 minutes ago F--- no! The news media is the old guard, they want the internet destroyed so you come crawling back to them to watch/read their stuff. They want the internet dead and gone forever permalink H TheMindUnfettered Grand Poobah of GamerGate [score hidden] 2 minutes ago But let me ask you this. In the 21st century, do we want the limits of speech decided by a handful of CEOs? Do we want to surrender truly free speech to platform holders only? What alternative do you propose? The trend is for social interaction to concentrate on a few platforms, which means that the p who control those platforms are going to control social interaction. This is nothing new, really. Every time a platform becomes toxic, people just move onto a new one. Digg -> Reddit. eople reifenstag [score hidden] a minute ago wow, if only someone could think up an idea of a free market where people could choose to support or protest the companies they want to by using or boycotting them..

Reddit
free speech reddit ellen pao ceo discussion

hypocrisy

Reddit Takes Down Post About Woman-on-Man Sexual Assault Posted in News Thu, Jun 11 -5:27 pm EDT 10 hours ago by Brandon Morse Comments: 16 8+1 10 i Like 244 | Tweet | ' 1 89 Wednesday, Washington Examiner reporter Ashe Schow released an article featuring a story about an Amherst College male student who blacked out after drinking alcohol and accompanied a fellow student back to her dorm room where, in his blacked-out state, she performed oral sex on him This occurred in 2012, and two years after the fact, the female student who performed oral sex would go on to accuse the man - now going by the pseudonym John Doe- of sexual assault. Receiving no due process, the man was then promptly expelled from Amherst. Despite evidence that proves Doe did not initiate the sexual encounter, or in any way commit sexual assault on his fellow student, Amherst refused to reopen Doe's case You can read more of Ashe Schow's article here The article in question was posted to Reddit on the r/NotTheOnion subReddit and quickly made it to the front page, garnering some 3300+ upvotes. It was then quickly taken down under the excuse that it was "tabloid news. I reached out to Schow for a comment. I was really excited when I realized my article was on the front page of Reddit, but within minutes it was gone. The reason given was that the article was considered tabloid news'. There are other articles in the r/nottheonion subReddit that are similar in content," she told me While other articles from the Washington Examiner, a respected news source, still remain on the site itself, this article from Ashe Schow, a respected reporter who focuses on campus assaults and radic al feminism, is the only one to be taken down. That her article of female-on-male sexual assault was labeled as "tabloid news" does not speak well of the direction the website has taken As of late, Reddit has undergone a transformation that leans more toward the politic ally correct. Where the site was once a bastion of free speech, no matter how obscene and hateful that speech was - under the new guidelines laid down by CEO Ellen Pao-the site has targeted certain articles and subReddits for deletion due to their "offensive" nature. Pao was brought on as CEO of Reddit last January, and has since set out to make Reddit a more social justice friendly place by setting a new set of rules for Reddit users
Reddit Takes Down Post About Woman-on-Man Sexual Assault Posted in News Thu, Jun 11 -5:27 pm EDT 10 hours ago by Brandon Morse Comments: 16 8+1 10 i Like 244 | Tweet | ' 1 89 Wednesday, Washington Examiner reporter Ashe Schow released an article featuring a story about an Amherst College male student who blacked out after drinking alcohol and accompanied a fellow student back to her dorm room where, in his blacked-out state, she performed oral sex on him This occurred in 2012, and two years after the fact, the female student who performed oral sex would go on to accuse the man - now going by the pseudonym John Doe- of sexual assault. Receiving no due process, the man was then promptly expelled from Amherst. Despite evidence that proves Doe did not initiate the sexual encounter, or in any way commit sexual assault on his fellow student, Amherst refused to reopen Doe's case You can read more of Ashe Schow's article here The article in question was posted to Reddit on the r/NotTheOnion subReddit and quickly made it to the front page, garnering some 3300+ upvotes. It was then quickly taken down under the excuse that it was "tabloid news. I reached out to Schow for a comment. I was really excited when I realized my article was on the front page of Reddit, but within minutes it was gone. The reason given was that the article was considered tabloid news'. There are other articles in the r/nottheonion subReddit that are similar in content," she told me While other articles from the Washington Examiner, a respected news source, still remain on the site itself, this article from Ashe Schow, a respected reporter who focuses on campus assaults and radic al feminism, is the only one to be taken down. That her article of female-on-male sexual assault was labeled as "tabloid news" does not speak well of the direction the website has taken As of late, Reddit has undergone a transformation that leans more toward the politic ally correct. Where the site was once a bastion of free speech, no matter how obscene and hateful that speech was - under the new guidelines laid down by CEO Ellen Pao-the site has targeted certain articles and subReddits for deletion due to their "offensive" nature. Pao was brought on as CEO of Reddit last January, and has since set out to make Reddit a more social justice friendly place by setting a new set of rules for Reddit users

Reddit
reddit censorship

NP links

https://archive.is/aODGa SHITREDDITSAYS comments related IMETA] submitting np links to SRS is now banned (self.ShitRedditSays) submitted 13 hours ago*by ArchangelleStrudelle OF OUR BRD'S FACE stickied post -68 Just cuz they're annoying and pointless. From now on if you submit a "no participation" link to np.reddit.com a robot will remove it and send you a message Also, friendly reminder that commenting in linked threads is a-OK and has never been against SRS rules or against reddit's rules Edit: also this script will automatically change np links to normal links on the rest of reddit. Although you have to edit it to work with https P.S. don't vote in linked threads 31 comments share
https://archive.is/aODGa SHITREDDITSAYS comments related IMETA] submitting np links to SRS is now banned (self.ShitRedditSays) submitted 13 hours ago*by ArchangelleStrudelle OF OUR BRD'S FACE stickied post -68 Just cuz they're annoying and pointless. From now on if you submit a "no participation" link to np.reddit.com a robot will remove it and send you a message Also, friendly reminder that commenting in linked threads is a-OK and has never been against SRS rules or against reddit's rules Edit: also this script will automatically change np links to normal links on the rest of reddit. Although you have to edit it to work with https P.S. don't vote in linked threads 31 comments share

Reddit
censorship reddit

Fukkit

fukkit
fukkit

Reddit
reddit parody postal 2 paradise lost fukkit running with scissors

Glorious

if you see this png file while scrolling You have been visited by the streisand fairy of frivilous gender lawsuits beneficial shadowbans will come your way but only if you say: THANK YOU ELLEN PAO
if you see this png file while scrolling You have been visited by the streisand fairy of frivilous gender lawsuits beneficial shadowbans will come your way but only if you say: THANK YOU ELLEN PAO

Reddit
ellen pao our glorious leader you have been visited by shadowban

Reddit protesters switch tactics

imgur.com) submitted 4 hours ago by MyNameIsntPoop to /r/circlejerk 23 comments share save hide report 26 1006 imgur.com) submitted 3 hours ago by DodecahadronCollider to /r/circlejerk 13 comments share save hide report 27 986 imgur.com) submitted 3 hours ago by DodecahadronCollider to /r/circlejerk 5 comments share save hide report 28 952 P (imgur.com) 29 2179 submitted 7 hours ago by thadiusjarvius to /r/APunchableFace 267 comments share save hide report imgur.com) 30 2100 submitted 7 hours ago by thadiusjarvius to /r/APunchableFace 69 comments share save hide report imgur.com) 31 2084 submitted 7 hours ago by thadiusjarvius to /r/APunchableFace 84 comments share save hide report
imgur.com) submitted 4 hours ago by MyNameIsntPoop to /r/circlejerk 23 comments share save hide report 26 1006 imgur.com) submitted 3 hours ago by DodecahadronCollider to /r/circlejerk 13 comments share save hide report 27 986 imgur.com) submitted 3 hours ago by DodecahadronCollider to /r/circlejerk 5 comments share save hide report 28 952 P (imgur.com) 29 2179 submitted 7 hours ago by thadiusjarvius to /r/APunchableFace 267 comments share save hide report imgur.com) 30 2100 submitted 7 hours ago by thadiusjarvius to /r/APunchableFace 69 comments share save hide report imgur.com) 31 2084 submitted 7 hours ago by thadiusjarvius to /r/APunchableFace 84 comments share save hide report

Reddit
fatpeoplehate reddit censorship fat hate steeple fatsteeplehate

June 11, 2015 - /r/circlejerk becomes Fat Steeple Hate

this post was submitted on 11 Jun 2015 Announcing Fat steepe irclgen) 3,730 points (87% upvoted) 3730 (.y ! submitted 1 day ago by OBI ⅣATER [M] @ Hello all! The mod team would like to discuss an issue with our society thatshortink has plagued us for years. In the past this was considered "gross" or "unhealthy", but more and more people are embracing it now and it's leading many people into a very unwholesome lifestyle. What I'm talking about of course is Fat Steeples. Steeples are a staple to every church or equivalent place of worship and have been around in the world for over 600 years, but recently more and more architects are allowing their steeples to get larger, leading to a dangerously hefty piece of architecture. These architects don't care about the danger they are causing to others or to themselves with these steeples and thus the world needs to be educated on this issue. Fat steeple acceptance has become the "hip" new thing for internet users everywhere and even popular pop artists have written songs about how it's "cool" to have a fat steeple. To help spread awareness about this problem /r/Circlejerk will become a Fat Steeple Hate themed subreddit. Fat steeple shaming posts will be allowed, but we are trying to glorify the beauty of a healthy steeple so feel free to post pictures of normal beautiful shafts. Please try and keep the discussion civil and on topic to steeples ONLY. Have a great day everyone and remember, fat steeple f------ suck. username password ■ remember me reset password ( login ) 253,696 shitlords O 2,425 shitlords online . Make fun of disgusting, fat steeples. 282 comments share
this post was submitted on 11 Jun 2015 Announcing Fat steepe irclgen) 3,730 points (87% upvoted) 3730 (.y ! submitted 1 day ago by OBI ⅣATER [M] @ Hello all! The mod team would like to discuss an issue with our society thatshortink has plagued us for years. In the past this was considered "gross" or "unhealthy", but more and more people are embracing it now and it's leading many people into a very unwholesome lifestyle. What I'm talking about of course is Fat Steeples. Steeples are a staple to every church or equivalent place of worship and have been around in the world for over 600 years, but recently more and more architects are allowing their steeples to get larger, leading to a dangerously hefty piece of architecture. These architects don't care about the danger they are causing to others or to themselves with these steeples and thus the world needs to be educated on this issue. Fat steeple acceptance has become the "hip" new thing for internet users everywhere and even popular pop artists have written songs about how it's "cool" to have a fat steeple. To help spread awareness about this problem /r/Circlejerk will become a Fat Steeple Hate themed subreddit. Fat steeple shaming posts will be allowed, but we are trying to glorify the beauty of a healthy steeple so feel free to post pictures of normal beautiful shafts. Please try and keep the discussion civil and on topic to steeples ONLY. Have a great day everyone and remember, fat steeple f------ suck. username password ■ remember me reset password ( login ) 253,696 shitlords O 2,425 shitlords online . Make fun of disgusting, fat steeples. 282 comments share

Reddit
fatpeoplehate fatsteeplehate steeple hate fat reddit censorship protest

Mods of Reddit

reddit MESSAGE compose inbox sent aunread I messages | comment replies I post replies | username mentions Ir/me irl you've been banned from /r/me /r/me_ir you've been banned from /r/me_irl expand all collapse all -] subreddit message via /r/me_irl/ sent 3 days ago you have been banned from posting to /r/me_irl you can contact the moderators regarding your ban by replying to this message. warning: using other accounts to circumvent a subreddit ban is considered a violation of reddit's site rules and can result in being banned from reddit entirely permalink report block subreddit mark unread reply - to /r/me_irl/ sent 2 days ago Why am I banned? permalink reply [M] via /r/me_irl/ sent 2 days ago posting modmails why do u think permalink report block user mark unread reply -1 to[M] via /r/me irl/ sent 2 days ago Thats not against the rules permalink reply fromIM] via /r/me_irl/ sent 2 days ago permalink report block user mark unread reply -1 to[M] via /r/me irl/ sent 2 days ago So then why am I banned? permalink reply [M] via /r/me_irl/ sent 2 days ago posting modmails why do you think permalink report block user mark unread reply [-] toM] via /r/me_irl/ sent 14 hours ago Still waiting permalink reply I-1 fromM] via //me_irl/ sent 14 hours ago http://i.imgur.com/a787oBR.jpg permalink report block user mark unread reply I-1 fromIM via /r/me_irl/ sent 14 hours ago permalink report block user mark unread reply [-] to[M] via /r/me_irl/ sent 23 minutes ago So you guys are banning me when I didn't break any rules? permalink reply -] from [M] via /r/me_irl/ sent 2 minutes ago There's no constitution here you can't lawyer your way out of it This sub is our house and you are uninvited for pooping in the hallway. We do not need to demonstrate to you where in the rules it says "don't s--- on the carpet" for you to be asked to leave permalink report block user mark unread reply -1 to[M] via /r/me_irl/ sent 5 minutes ago "F--- the rules, I just don't like you" K. permalink reply [-] fromM via /r/me_irl/ sent just now exactly. f--- off permalink report block user mark unread reply
reddit MESSAGE compose inbox sent aunread I messages | comment replies I post replies | username mentions Ir/me irl you've been banned from /r/me /r/me_ir you've been banned from /r/me_irl expand all collapse all -] subreddit message via /r/me_irl/ sent 3 days ago you have been banned from posting to /r/me_irl you can contact the moderators regarding your ban by replying to this message. warning: using other accounts to circumvent a subreddit ban is considered a violation of reddit's site rules and can result in being banned from reddit entirely permalink report block subreddit mark unread reply - to /r/me_irl/ sent 2 days ago Why am I banned? permalink reply [M] via /r/me_irl/ sent 2 days ago posting modmails why do u think permalink report block user mark unread reply -1 to[M] via /r/me irl/ sent 2 days ago Thats not against the rules permalink reply fromIM] via /r/me_irl/ sent 2 days ago permalink report block user mark unread reply -1 to[M] via /r/me irl/ sent 2 days ago So then why am I banned? permalink reply [M] via /r/me_irl/ sent 2 days ago posting modmails why do you think permalink report block user mark unread reply [-] toM] via /r/me_irl/ sent 14 hours ago Still waiting permalink reply I-1 fromM] via //me_irl/ sent 14 hours ago http://i.imgur.com/a787oBR.jpg permalink report block user mark unread reply I-1 fromIM via /r/me_irl/ sent 14 hours ago permalink report block user mark unread reply [-] to[M] via /r/me_irl/ sent 23 minutes ago So you guys are banning me when I didn't break any rules? permalink reply -] from [M] via /r/me_irl/ sent 2 minutes ago There's no constitution here you can't lawyer your way out of it This sub is our house and you are uninvited for pooping in the hallway. We do not need to demonstrate to you where in the rules it says "don't s--- on the carpet" for you to be asked to leave permalink report block user mark unread reply -1 to[M] via /r/me_irl/ sent 5 minutes ago "F--- the rules, I just don't like you" K. permalink reply [-] fromM via /r/me_irl/ sent just now exactly. f--- off permalink report block user mark unread reply

Reddit
drama ban reddit

Breaking containment

ke Conta
ke Conta

Reddit
waste reddit fatpeoplehate streisand effect containment

Blaming the investors

I'M MARC ANDREESSEN. MY VC FIRM, ANDREESSEN HOROWITZ, INVESTED S50 MILLION IN REDDIT IN LATE 2014 IKNEW ELLEN PAO HAD LEGAL DRAMA WITH MY COMPETITOR, VC FIRM KLEINER PERKINS IALSO KNEW THE MEDIA WOULD HAVE IGNORED HER CASE IF SHE WASN'T HIGH PROFILE SO I IMMEDIATELY APPOINTED HER AS CEO OF REDDIT TO BOOST HER PROFILE, HOPING THAT HER MISOGYNY ACCUSATIONS WOULD DESTROY MY COMPETITOR'S REPUTATION. HI, I'M MARC ANDREESSEN, MY VC FIRM, ANDREESSEN HOROWITZ, INVESTED S40 MILLION INIMGUR AND $50 MILLION IN REDDIT I'M ALSO ONE OF9 BOARD MEMBERS AT FACEBOOK, IORDERED FATPEOPLEHATE TO BE BANNED FROM BOTHSITES BECAUSE I'M TRYING TO CLEAN THEM UP TO SELL THEM TO FACEBOOK FOR $1 BILLION AND GET A 10X RETURN ON MY INVESTMENT. IT'S NOTHING PERSONAL.. IT'S JUST BUSINESS.
I'M MARC ANDREESSEN. MY VC FIRM, ANDREESSEN HOROWITZ, INVESTED S50 MILLION IN REDDIT IN LATE 2014 IKNEW ELLEN PAO HAD LEGAL DRAMA WITH MY COMPETITOR, VC FIRM KLEINER PERKINS IALSO KNEW THE MEDIA WOULD HAVE IGNORED HER CASE IF SHE WASN'T HIGH PROFILE SO I IMMEDIATELY APPOINTED HER AS CEO OF REDDIT TO BOOST HER PROFILE, HOPING THAT HER MISOGYNY ACCUSATIONS WOULD DESTROY MY COMPETITOR'S REPUTATION. HI, I'M MARC ANDREESSEN, MY VC FIRM, ANDREESSEN HOROWITZ, INVESTED S40 MILLION INIMGUR AND $50 MILLION IN REDDIT I'M ALSO ONE OF9 BOARD MEMBERS AT FACEBOOK, IORDERED FATPEOPLEHATE TO BE BANNED FROM BOTHSITES BECAUSE I'M TRYING TO CLEAN THEM UP TO SELL THEM TO FACEBOOK FOR $1 BILLION AND GET A 10X RETURN ON MY INVESTMENT. IT'S NOTHING PERSONAL.. IT'S JUST BUSINESS.

Reddit
warlock99 marc andreessen ellen pao reddit andreessen horowitz kleiner perkins capitalism conspiracy theories

The upbringing of Gilda Mars

Why does you re too can Wn at r8ise me thiS 0 avee The g4 Stay n ne excuse Corner by ' yovrse/ ve me one ex inall ove ya iHe shy yvF now, thou Downvote op
Why does you re too can Wn at r8ise me thiS 0 avee The g4 Stay n ne excuse Corner by ' yovrse/ ve me one ex inall ove ya iHe shy yvF now, thou Downvote op

Reddit
gilda mars vivian james reddit ellen pao

Posting about ...

A HA IT'S OF ITS CIS SCUM ELLEN SJW les Neckbeards Jews MuslimtS BEN GARRISON
A HA IT'S OF ITS CIS SCUM ELLEN SJW les Neckbeards Jews MuslimtS BEN GARRISON

Reddit
censorship reddit ellen pao fatpeoplehate cis scum jews muslims carlos latuff sjw harassment

Control of internet speech

HOW WOULD YOU LIKE THIS WRAPPED? PROTECT (PROTECT PRO IDSWOMEN FATTIES TECT TERRORISMKIDS R--- REDDIT ADMINS CONTROL INTEPRT SPEECH EN SoN)
HOW WOULD YOU LIKE THIS WRAPPED? PROTECT (PROTECT PRO IDSWOMEN FATTIES TECT TERRORISMKIDS R--- REDDIT ADMINS CONTROL INTEPRT SPEECH EN SoN)

Reddit
john jonik ellen pao reddit subreddit banned fatpeoplehate feminism censorship internet

meanwhile on /r/all

257 comments share save hide report F--- ELLEN PAO F--- ELLEN PAO F--- ELLEN PAO F--- ELLEN PAO F--- ELLEN PAO F--- ELLEN PAO F--- ELLEN PAO F--- ELLEN PAO F--- ELLEN PAO F--- ELLEN PAO F--- ELLEN PAO F--- ELLEN PAO F--- ELLEN PAO F--- ELLEN PAO F--- ELLEN PAO F--- ELLEN PAO F--- ELLEN PAO F--- ELLEN PAO 8 3254 F--- ELLEN PAO F--- ELLEN PAO (i.imgur.com submitted 5 hours ago by Celebit [M] to /r/iAm A_troll_AmA. 17 comments share save hide report ↑ Christopher Lee dies at the age of 93 (theguardian.com) subm itted 49 minutes ago by castlej to /r/news 126 comments share save hide report F--- you General Pao (imgur.com) submitted 5 hours ago by SillyVillager to /r/FuckYouEllenPao 21 comments share save hide report 10 3240 Ellen Pao. If you vote this up, it will show up on Google Images when people Google search Ellen Pao, Reddit Mods or 11 3615 Reddit CEO imgur.com) submitted 5 hours ago by GENTLY_HATING to /r/EllenPaoIsABig C--- 130 comments share save hide report Ellen Pao, UPVOTE FOR THIS TO SHOW UP ON GOOGLE submitted 6 hours ago by ModsAreKillingReddit to /r/Stuff 84 comments share save hide report (us.reddit.com) 12 3693 Ellen Pao. If you vote this up, it will show up on Google Images when people Google search Ellen Pao, Reddit Mods or Reddit CEO. (i.imgur.com) submitted 5 hours ago by GENTLY_HATING to /r/PaoMustResign 293 comments share save hide report 13 3779 Reddit CEO Ellen Pao Reddit CEO Ellen Pao Reddit CEO Ellen Pao Reddit CEO Ellen Pao Reddit CEO Ellen Pao Reddit CEO Ellen Pao Reddit CEO Ellen Pao Reddit CEO Ellen Pao Reddit CEO Ellen Pao Reddit CEO Ellen Pao Reddit CEO Ellen Pao Reddit CEO Ellen Pao is a total c--- and should resign immediately. (i.imgur.com) submitted 2 hours ago by Celebit [M] to /r/iAm A_troll_AmA 2 comments share save hide report Ellen Pao. If you vote this up, it will show up on Google Images when people Google search Ellen Pao, Reddit Mods or Reddit CEO 5 3652 (us.reddit.com)

Reddit
reddit ellen pao

STAND STRONG WITH COMRADE PAO!!


Reddit
ellen pao chairman pao flag communist

EMBRACE THE CULTURAL REVOLUTION

ATION IS FOR THE WEN CENSORED
ATION IS FOR THE WEN CENSORED

Reddit
ellen pao chairman pao our glorious leader imagination is for the weak censored

Our glorious leader


Reddit
ellen pao chairman pao

Things on reddit

H subreddit-llama 75 points 5 hours ago* I used to do some work for an agency that specifically targetted SJWs. They were basically liberal, middle-class, university educated white women and their low-status male admirers. It is profitable. They do spend lots of money Most of the famous SJWs are trust-fund babies. The working SJWs (and there are plenty) aren't as loud and don't spend so much time begging for you to supplement their trust fund or to fund their cutting edge game, made in game-maker, about being cat-called (games are art and therefore don't have to be fun, shitlord) They are the types of people who buy "male tears" mugs or t-shirts with "smash the patriarchy" written on them or a quilt with "die cis scum" embroided on it and then post photos of themselves on Tumblr (with a referral link to where they bought that item) One of the things about the agency's target demographic was the amount they would spend on worthless s---. Not only would they buy it, they would then tweet about it and write about it on their Tumblr and Facebook. They would post pictures of themselves with the item they'd been sold (by an entirely male-owned company), which led to more sales of these high-profit-margin items. These people are prolific consumers. They click ads, they fall for fake marketeer profiles because they hear what they want to hear. They are a money maker. They're the left's equivalent of people who'd buy anything with an American flag on for the years following 9/11. They're people who you could market an item to by putting the prefix "Freedom" in front of a product name. They're just like the people who'd buy any old s--- with a bald eagle on it. They are just like the people who buy "from my cold dead hands" pro-gun bumper stickers. They're a demographic that want people to know their opinions and wear it on their sleeve and on their car. They are a demographic that reddit wants. Reddit exists to make money (which it has failed to do so far). They are a demographic that 4chan wants. Moot wants to make more money and he isn't going to do it through bunch of tech-savvy geeks who love piracy. Reddit and 4Chan don't want people who know what Adblock is. They want people who will buy a t-shirt made in a Taiwanese sweatshop with a pro-feminist message on it (and 500% mark-up). How do you attract those people? You pander to them. You make spaces safe so that they'll come in. You cleanse your site of the "undesirables" that are there so that they will come and spend What we're seeing here is a kind of gentrification of high-traffic parts of the internet. These sites want to make money and they're not going to do it through some ad-block, VPN, piratebay, google-fu expert who posts things that makes the ladies want to faint You see this sort of thing in music festivals. The festivals are made good by members of the counter-culture, but when the festivals start attracting big names, suddenly ticket prices climb, drugs are banned completely, nakedness, improptu perfomances, and general anarchy are stopped and it becomes some homogenised, middle-class-mother- friendly pop concert with Hummus everywhere and excellent baby-changing facilities. Why? Because dirty hippies don't spend as much money as middle class moms and university-educated white girls
H subreddit-llama 75 points 5 hours ago* I used to do some work for an agency that specifically targetted SJWs. They were basically liberal, middle-class, university educated white women and their low-status male admirers. It is profitable. They do spend lots of money Most of the famous SJWs are trust-fund babies. The working SJWs (and there are plenty) aren't as loud and don't spend so much time begging for you to supplement their trust fund or to fund their cutting edge game, made in game-maker, about being cat-called (games are art and therefore don't have to be fun, shitlord) They are the types of people who buy "male tears" mugs or t-shirts with "smash the patriarchy" written on them or a quilt with "die cis scum" embroided on it and then post photos of themselves on Tumblr (with a referral link to where they bought that item) One of the things about the agency's target demographic was the amount they would spend on worthless s---. Not only would they buy it, they would then tweet about it and write about it on their Tumblr and Facebook. They would post pictures of themselves with the item they'd been sold (by an entirely male-owned company), which led to more sales of these high-profit-margin items. These people are prolific consumers. They click ads, they fall for fake marketeer profiles because they hear what they want to hear. They are a money maker. They're the left's equivalent of people who'd buy anything with an American flag on for the years following 9/11. They're people who you could market an item to by putting the prefix "Freedom" in front of a product name. They're just like the people who'd buy any old s--- with a bald eagle on it. They are just like the people who buy "from my cold dead hands" pro-gun bumper stickers. They're a demographic that want people to know their opinions and wear it on their sleeve and on their car. They are a demographic that reddit wants. Reddit exists to make money (which it has failed to do so far). They are a demographic that 4chan wants. Moot wants to make more money and he isn't going to do it through bunch of tech-savvy geeks who love piracy. Reddit and 4Chan don't want people who know what Adblock is. They want people who will buy a t-shirt made in a Taiwanese sweatshop with a pro-feminist message on it (and 500% mark-up). How do you attract those people? You pander to them. You make spaces safe so that they'll come in. You cleanse your site of the "undesirables" that are there so that they will come and spend What we're seeing here is a kind of gentrification of high-traffic parts of the internet. These sites want to make money and they're not going to do it through some ad-block, VPN, piratebay, google-fu expert who posts things that makes the ladies want to faint You see this sort of thing in music festivals. The festivals are made good by members of the counter-culture, but when the festivals start attracting big names, suddenly ticket prices climb, drugs are banned completely, nakedness, improptu perfomances, and general anarchy are stopped and it becomes some homogenised, middle-class-mother- friendly pop concert with Hummus everywhere and excellent baby-changing facilities. Why? Because dirty hippies don't spend as much money as middle class moms and university-educated white girls

Reddit
reddit censorship and stuff

Join Socialism mean joining Feminism not becoming a socialist.

Capitalist on /r/Socialism to /r/socialism I am not a socialist capitalism is a superior/more realistic system you're golden. Asking questions is fine :P I'm a socialist Hi mods, I'm interested in your sub, as an intersectional feminist. I am, however, not a socialist, I generally have the opinion that capitalism is a superior/more realistic system. I just wanted to know if it's okay for me to be involved in the community despite my non-socialist tendencies. Can I join in discussions about other issues? Thank you. permalink source reply full comments I'm not a feminist You're probably not a good fit for the community. re: Capitalist on /r/Socialism [-1][M] via /r/socialism/ GOVERNMENT As long as you don't s--- on socialism or try and promote capitalism you're golden. Asking questions is fine though. Also capitalism is just as "realistic" as patriarchy :P permalink source report block user mark unread reply full comments I'm a socialist You're not a good fit I am not a socialist Can I be involved in this community? to /r/socialism/ you're golden involved in this community Hi mods, I've been subscribed for a while, posted here and there, I do, however, have a question about my compatibility with the sub: I'm not down on the identity politics. I'm a socialist, which I hope is enough, but I'm not a feminist, and I disagree with the ideas of patriarchy, white/male privilege, etc. I just wanted to know if it's okay for me to be involved in the community despite my anti- feminist tendencies. Can I discuss other issues? Thank you permalink source reply full comments you're golden /r/socialism re: Can I be involved in this community? from COVERNHIEm [-1][m] via /r/socialism/ You're probably not a good fit for the community. But, if you avoid saying those things or talking about your views on this one subject, you won't be banned if you don't break the rules. permalink source report block user mark unread reply full comments
Capitalist on /r/Socialism to /r/socialism I am not a socialist capitalism is a superior/more realistic system you're golden. Asking questions is fine :P I'm a socialist Hi mods, I'm interested in your sub, as an intersectional feminist. I am, however, not a socialist, I generally have the opinion that capitalism is a superior/more realistic system. I just wanted to know if it's okay for me to be involved in the community despite my non-socialist tendencies. Can I join in discussions about other issues? Thank you. permalink source reply full comments I'm not a feminist You're probably not a good fit for the community. re: Capitalist on /r/Socialism [-1][M] via /r/socialism/ GOVERNMENT As long as you don't s--- on socialism or try and promote capitalism you're golden. Asking questions is fine though. Also capitalism is just as "realistic" as patriarchy :P permalink source report block user mark unread reply full comments I'm a socialist You're not a good fit I am not a socialist Can I be involved in this community? to /r/socialism/ you're golden involved in this community Hi mods, I've been subscribed for a while, posted here and there, I do, however, have a question about my compatibility with the sub: I'm not down on the identity politics. I'm a socialist, which I hope is enough, but I'm not a feminist, and I disagree with the ideas of patriarchy, white/male privilege, etc. I just wanted to know if it's okay for me to be involved in the community despite my anti- feminist tendencies. Can I discuss other issues? Thank you permalink source reply full comments you're golden /r/socialism re: Can I be involved in this community? from COVERNHIEm [-1][m] via /r/socialism/ You're probably not a good fit for the community. But, if you avoid saying those things or talking about your views on this one subject, you won't be banned if you don't break the rules. permalink source report block user mark unread reply full comments

Reddit
socialism reddit /r/socialism golden feminism feminist socialist